Like this?:
function padRow(rowNumber, rowCount) {
return " ".repeat(rowCount - rowNumber) + character.repeat(rowNumber) + " ".repeat(rowCount - rowNumber);
}
that is a better one. What do the tests say?
I’ve edited your code for readability. When you enter a code block into a forum post, please precede it with a separate line of three backticks and follow it with a separate line of three backticks to make it easier to read.
You can also use the “preformatted text” tool in the editor (</>) to add backticks around text.
See this post to find the backtick on your keyboard.
Note: Backticks (`) are not single quotes (').
Its the first time, it actually says, nothing…
what do you mean? what do you see?
Before it said nothing. But I guess it works now. But why isn’t (rowCount - rowNumber) added to the character.repeat part
because it doesn’t match the number, you want only 1 character if you are at rowNumber of 1, if you use rowCount - rowNumber it’s not 1
1 Like
@im59138 But the next step doesn’t work the same way? (Step 70)
if you have questions about step 70 please open a topic for step 70
crea una variable = le pones los space.repeat y el resto de instrucciones, y luego lo llamas al principio y al final