Test Result
Alice has some number of cards and she wants to rearrange the cards into groups so that each group is of size groupSize
, and consists of groupSize
consecutive cards.
Given an integer array hand
where hand[i]
is the value written on the ith
card and an integer groupSize
, return true
if she can rearrange the cards, or false
otherwise.
Example 1:
Input: hand = [1,2,3,6,2,3,4,7,8], groupSize = 3
Output: true
Explanation: Alice’s hand can be rearranged as [1,2,3],[2,3,4],[6,7,8]
Example 2:
Input: hand = [1,2,3,4,5], groupSize = 4
Output: false
Explanation: Alice’s hand can not be rearranged into groups of 4.
Constraints:
1 <= hand.length <= 104
0 <= hand[i] <= 109
1 <= groupSize <= hand.length
here is the part of the solution
hand.sort((a, b) => a  b);
for (const card of hand) {
for (let i = 0; i < groupSize; i++) {
}
}
gpt respose

Sorting Step: The time complexity of sorting the
hand
array is(O(n log n))
. This is the dominating factor in the overall time complexity. 
Iteration through Sorted Cards: After sorting, we iterate through the sorted cards once, which takes
(O(n))
time. 
Inner Loop for Group Formation: Within each iteration of the outer loop, the inner loop runs for a constant number of times, determined by the problem’s constraints. Therefore, the inner loop’s time complexity is effectively
(O(1))
within the scope of each outer loop iteration. 
Overall Time Complexity: Considering the sorting step’s time complexity as
(O(n log n))
and the subsequent linear iteration through the sorted array((O(n)))
, the overall time complexity is(O(n log n))
since(n log n)
dominates(n)
.
I understand 1 , 2 time complexities, but why 3rd one is O(1) i.e inner loop, it depends on the groupSize in worst case group size may be n, so woudn’t it be O(n)
instead of O(1)
??
i appreciate all your responses. I am sorry , if you might have been rude, while reading my post.