Why Use Sign Language Overlay Instead of Captions / Subtitles?

Hey everyone :wave: :smile:

In the lecture “What Are Good Ways to Make Audio and Video Content Accessible?” in the new full-stack curriculum, the instructor says:

Other ways to make your video and audio content accessible include adding a sign language overlay for videos for deaf people and those hard of hearing […]

This confused me. I don’t know much about accessibility (hence my question), so I certainly don’t mean to be presumptive, impose my preferences, or anything of the sort, but I genuinely don’t understand how deaf / hard of hearing people would be better served with a sign language overlay instead of captions.

Wouldn’t captions provide the same service that a sign language overlay would (allowing people to understand what they cannot hear) while also being less distracting or intrusive?

Please help me understand. Thank you!

Sign language provides an alternative way to access the site for deaf or hard of hearing people, as well as captions.

See Understanding Success Criterion 1.2.6: Sign Language (Prerecorded) | WAI | W3C.

1 Like

That link cleared things up nicely. Thank you!

1 Like