Hi guys,

at this lesson

my question is

why isn’t it possible to type it like this?

```
if (a || b <0) {
return undefined;
}
```

instead of

```
if (a <0 || b <0) {
return undefined;
}
```

since they have the same result, was wondering, thanks.

Hi guys,

at this lesson

my question is

why isn’t it possible to type it like this?

```
if (a || b <0) {
return undefined;
}
```

instead of

```
if (a <0 || b <0) {
return undefined;
}
```

since they have the same result, was wondering, thanks.

Its just syntax I guess.

The same applies in mathematics after all

```
3 * 4 + 5 != 3 * ( 4 + 5 )
```

In this case the `||`

and `&&`

operators need conditionals that evaluate to true or false on either side of them.

That is my understanding at least.

!EDIT! truthiness is not the same as true or false, see [nhcarrigan]'s explanation below

1 Like

Hey there,

The conditions within an `if`

statement are evaluated for *truthiness*.

If we look at `a < 0`

, with some values for `a`

:

- if
`a`

is`3`

, then`3 < 0`

which is false - if
`a`

is`-3`

, then`-3 < 0`

which is true.

With your above proposal of `a || b < 0`

, we get into a tricky bit. The expressions on each side of an `||`

operator are evaluated *independently*.

So you are checking for at least *one* of the following to be truthy:

`a`

`b < 0`

The “gotcha” here is that any number value is considered truthy *except* 0. So where we had `a < 0`

being false if `a`

had a value of 3, here we’d have `a`

being true (because 3 is a truthy value).

2 Likes

Thanks for your explanation , it makes sense.

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed 182 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.