Is it possible that an alternative for loop for the correct answer exists without using <= operator

Is it possible that an alternative for loop for the correct answer exists without using <= operator
0

#1

Continuing the discussion from freeCodeCamp Challenge Guide: Iterate Odd Numbers With a For Loop:

Here are the instructions with an example:

Iterate Odd Numbers With a For Loop
For loops don’t have to iterate one at a time. By changing our final-expression, we can count by even numbers.

We’ll start at i = 0 and loop while i < 10. We’ll increment i by 2 each loop with i += 2.

**var ourArray = [];**
**for (var i = 0; i < 10; i += 2) {**
**  ourArray.push(i);**
**}**
**ourArray will now contain [0,2,4,6,8].**

Let’s change our initialization so we can count by odd numbers.

Instructions
Push the odd numbers from 1 through 9 to myArray using a for loop.

Here is my code:

// Example
var ourArray = [];

for (var i = 0; i < 10; i += 2) {
  ourArray.push(i);
}

// Setup
var myArray = [];
for (var i = 1; i *<= 9*; i +=2) {myArray.push(i);}
// Only change code below this line.

Could one use the < operator where I have made the stars instead of the <= operator?

Just trying to see if the concept is more flexible than I presume it is.


#2

Instead of asking, why don’t you try it?


#3

Im currently reviewing my work to make sure I understand the fundamentals. I think this was quite a while ago.