Please do not post AI responses here.
It is not Ai responses. It is the responses of mine.
I don’t understand your reply. You have one line here instead of two lines like the instructions asked for.
It really often looks like you use AI when you aren’t just posting the instructions or error message with no discussion.
Your grammar and structure changes radically between posts and the style ofsome of your posts matches the style of AI
I discuss every error of mine by myself, it’s not an AI.
Cool. I still think you’re using GPT or something like that. It can be fine to use something like GPT to help you edit your grammar but the content should be all from you and what has you stuck in your learning.
I am a linguist and philologist by profession, and I know how to write in different styles depending on my mood and the situation.
This really doesn’t seem likely
The challenge tests are specific about the challenge instructions. If you made changes to your previous code, like the test is saying you should not modify your label element. If you accidentally made any changes, that your code will not pass. Reset the challenge step and place the mouse cursor before last template literal string and press enter. Then write your new input element with required attributes and values as instructions asking.
1 Like
Exactly this. You really have to exactly follow what the instructions ask for or the tests won’t pass.
1 Like
You write: “Cool. I still think you’re using GPT or something similar. It might be useful to use something like GPT to help with grammar, but the content should still be entirely your own and reflect what has caused you to delay your learning.” I write on my own, without the assistance of AI. As a linguist and philologist, my communication style is varied, and this should not come as a surprise.
Just repeating random parts of the conversation isn’t really useful.
Yes, I am trying. I do 10-15 tests perfectly, but then on the 11th or 16th test, brain fatigue kicks in, which is why there are errors and inaccuracies.
So have you fixed this part that four people have pointed out yet?
I’m just having a conversation with you on abstract topics about AI, communication styles, and so on, so that you don’t think that I’m ignoring your opinion.
I just don’t believe what you are saying.
Why? Explain to me your poin of view.
I already have done so above.
So, each of us has shared our point of view on these topics. Now, can we move on to discussing the coding problem? Would you be offended if we no longer discuss these lyrical discussions about AI and communication styles, since we have already discussed everything about them?