Please Note: FCC algorithms are not "REAL" algorithms

Hi there burning-monk (I like your username btw lol :smile:)

What you say I think is true as well. ā€œrealā€ here is obviously being used subjectively by me because its my opinion, in the context of computer programming/coding:

real = computer science, Stanford University is among the greatest pioneers and contributors to computer science, and Stanfordsā€™ Coursera course (which is what they teach to their students) seems to have defined ā€œalgorithmsā€ according to the textbook:
https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Algorithms-Thomas-H-Cormen-ebook/dp/B007CNRCAO/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

Therefore, this has become in my opinion what ā€œrealā€ algorithms are. That is my reasoning, and I think that is reasonable. Right?

After all, without computer science, we wouldnā€™t have a keyboard to type, a touch screen to touch, a cpu and ram to process software, certainly there would be no such thing as a browser, and the internet is the brainchild of computer scientists. So yeah.