I can't understand what is missing here

Tell us what’s happening:
Describe your issue in detail here.

  **Your code so far**

function checkObj(obj,checkProp) {
// Only change code below this line
var result = "Not Found" ;
var myObj = {
gift : "pony",
pet  : "kitten",
bed  : "sleigh",
city : "Seattle"
if (myObj.hasOwnProperty(checkProp)){
  return myObj[checkProp];
return result;

// Only change code above this line
console.log(checkObj({gift: "pony", pet : "kitten", bed :"sleigh"},"gift"));

  **Your browser information:**

User Agent is: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/95.0.4638.54 Safari/537.36

Challenge: Testing Objects for Properties

Link to the challenge:

There’s no need to define myObj. Just use the argument “obj” instead.


1 Like

It worked, Thanks Buddy :heart:

It is great that you solved the challenge, but instead of posting your full working solution, it is best to stay focused on answering the original poster’s question(s) and help guide them with hints and suggestions to solve their own issues with the challenge.

We are trying to cut back on the number of spoiler solutions found on the forum and instead focus on helping other campers with their questions and definitely not posting full working solutions.

You can post solutions that invite discussion (like asking how the solution works, or asking about certain parts of the solution). But please don’t just post your solution for the sake of sharing it.
If you post a full passing solution to a challenge and have questions about it, please surround it with [spoiler] and [/spoiler] tags on the line above and below your solution code.

This topic was automatically closed 182 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.