Yeah, but that is what the review projects are.
The review projects are different from the learn projects.
For example, here is one of the intermediate algos
that could be one step right there
then you can add other steps to to build off of that and still have each step have a fair amount of stuff that the camper can do on their own and think critically.
So, we are on the same page.
It is just this a different approach on how we can incorporate this in the new curriculum
So this new project does look like it gives the learner more room to explore and build a function to a goal. And more are coming? That would help I think
and the goal is to have the review project alternate with the learn projects.
so by the time the camper gets to the first certification project, then they will have done a few review projects and learn how to think critically and solve problems on their own
i like this idea of alternating the regular projects with the review ones. Sounds promising.
I’m still harping on the loops before conditionals issue though.
Can we modify the Rosetta Code content? I wasn’t sure what sort of license they are distributed under vs our in house developed content from the legacy curriculum.
Hi Jeremy, Rosetta Code uses a permissive FDL 1.3 license. And yes, we can modify them as we see fit.
With the Project Euler challenges, we added our own tests to them to make them a bit more accessible than the originally were, and we can do the same here.
This said, we should come up with original projects for the core curriculum so that we don’t have to incorporate the FDL license into parts of the curriculum.