I used bluehost when I first started out on web development. I had almost 0 idea of what I was doing at the time, but if I remember correctly I was billed a lump sum.
After gaining more experience with web development I found bluehost might not be the best choice depending on what your doing. For example, there are a number of cheaper ways to get static site hosting up and running.
- heroku - a Paas offering, easy 1 line deployments
- netlify - creators of the JAM stack
- firebase - mainly mobile oriented, but their web offerings allow you to build an client-side app, and provide an API to get real-time database support. You don’t need to use any of the apis to get the static hosting.
- github pages - static hosting from github, relatively easy to use and always free.
all have free tier or are straight up free to use for static site hosting, along with maybe even more (heroku is a cloud Paas, so you can build an entire full stack app on it with just the free tier)
I recommend explaining your projects requirements, or what you want to do, as bluehost might not be the best choice, or the above services I posted might not apply 